| Leagle, Inc. is dedicated to making legal content and the knowledge contained therein more accessible and discoverable than ever before – anytime, anywhere, for anyone, through innovative, relevant web-based and mobile-media solutions. |
|
© Leagle, Inc. The Leagle.com website is intended to inform and keep readers abreast of developments in the law. It is not to be used or relied upon as a substitute for professional advice. Before acting on any legal matter, readers should discuss the situation with their own professional advisers. For further information, please see our Terms of Use. |
- In the Matter of Application of the U.S. (Re: The government needing warrants to obtain phone records showing a person's location) (See related news)
- FBT Productions v. Aftermath Records (Re: Whether songs downloaded from iTunes are purchased or licensed)
- Bouchat v. Baltimore Ravens (Re: Copyright infringement cause over a team logo)
- Bakalar v. Vavra (Re: Dispute over a drawing taken by the Nazis from a Dachau prisoner)
- Jane Doe 43C v. Diocese of New Ulm (Re: Sexual abuse claim)
- In re: Matter of Marriage of JB (Re: A Texas court's jurisdiction over a divorce case arising from a Massachusetts same-sex marriage)
- Broadvoice, Inc. v. TP Innovations LLC (Re: Defamation claim arising from postings of unflattering comments on bewareofbroadvoice.com)
- Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers, Inc. (Re: False marking qui tam action related to bow ties)
- Yocham v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. (Re: Claim that the antifungal med Lamisil led to development of Steven-Johnson Syndrome)
- Princo Corporation v. International Trade Commission (Re: Patent for recordable CDs)
- In re: Jones Soda Company Securities Litigation (Re: Securities fraud class action)
- Weiss v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals (Re: Proposed class action over a marketing campaign for the prescription drug Nexium)
- Heller v. Restoration Hardware, Inc. (Re: Pricing at discount outlets)
- Ajaxo Inc. v. E*Trade (Re: Deciding damages for misappropriating trade secrets)
- Allied Pilots Association v. American Airlines, Inc.
STATE EX REL. LETOHIOVOTE.ORG v. BRUNNER
2010 Ohio 919
State ex rel. LetOhioVote.org
v.
Brunner.
No. 2010-0367.
Supreme Court of Ohio.
March 12, 2010.
MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING
This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of the joint motion to consolidate this case with 2010-0415, State ex rel. New Models v. Brunner, and 2010-0421, State ex rel. Cummings v. Brunner,
It is ordered by the court that the motion to consolidate is granted. The briefing and presentation of evidence in case Nos. 2010-0367, 2010-0415, and 2010-0421 shall be consolidated. The parties shall file three originals of all documents and include all case numbers on the cover page. The parties shall otherwise comply with the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. 10.6 through 10.8.
It is further ordered, sua sponte, that the parties shall comply with the following revised schedule for the presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 10.6:
If the respondent has not already filed an answer, then respondent shall file an answer within three days of the date of this entry. The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within seven days of the date of this entry; relators shall file a brief within five days of the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within ten days after the filing of relators' brief; and relators may file a reply brief within five days after filing of respondent's brief.
This copy provided by Leagle, Inc.
| x | |